“[A]ny report of a famine in Russia is today an exaggeration or malignant propaganda,” Duranty wrote at the height of Stalin’s forced famine in the early 1930s. The Angela Project Presents The 400th Year Commemoration Ceremony: 1619-2019: Commemorating 400 Years of Institutionalized Slavery in Colonized America. We are a bit late in getting to that dog's breakfast called 'The 1619 Project," The New York Timers effort to "reframe"--read, "wildly distort"--die history and governing impetus of the American Founding. "The 1619 Project is not a history," Nikole Hannah-Jones said in an MSNBC interview on Sunday. There they all were, from Walter Duranty, the Times’s man in the Soviet Union under Stalin, on down. This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 38 Number 10, on page 1 Copyright © 2020 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com https://newcriterion.com/issues/2020/6/the-dark-side-of-farce, The Undying: Pain, Vulnerability, Mortality, Medicine, Art, Time, Dreams, Data, Exhaustion, Cancer, and Care, Last of the Whigs: Churchill as historian, https://newcriterion.com/issues/2020/6/the-dark-side-of-farce. Indeed, various public school districts, including some in Chicago, have announced that they will supplement their curricula by distributing copies of The 1619 Project to students, thereby promulgating the racialist worldview expounded by that “major” “reframing” of our history. When they are not giving awards to anti-capitalist, racially charged fictions masquerading as history—or tendentious politicized fictions like their “investigations” into non-existent collusion between Donald Trump and “the Russians,” for which they awarded themselves a Prize last year—they are giving them to twisted new-age self-dramatizations such as The Undying: Pain, Vulnerability, Mortality, Medicine, Art, Time, Dreams, Data, Exhaustion, Cancer, and Care, by Anne Boyer, “An elegant and unforgettable narrative about the brutality of illness and the capitalism of cancer care in America.” The “capitalism of cancer care”? As we write, the wildly tendentious, historically dubious tenets of The 1619 Project have been insinuated into the curricula of more than 3,500 school districts across the country. The New York Times The 1619 Project History Slavery Culture And though the copies will be paid for by the Times and donors, taxpayers will still be indirectly funding a version of history that is politically tendentious and wildly at odds with the facts. It’s just that it is controlled—de facto, if not de jure—by the Times and a handful of like-minded entities.Which of course is the reason that the Times has accumulated so many of them. Tumblr is a place to express yourself, discover yourself, and bond over the stuff you love. Someone tells you that the Apollo 11 moon landing was a carefully staged hoax perpetrated by nasa or the Trilateral Commission or whatever. Article excerpt. On the contrary, “it is the northern states in 1776 that are the world’s leaders in the antislavery cause. Back in January, we wondered whether “an unintended collateral benefit of this malign folly will be—finally, at last—to dissolve the vestiges of that prestige and expose the [Times] to the condign contempt of the public whose trust they have so extravagantly betrayed.” Alas, the Pulitzer Prize argues against that happy eventuality. But if one were to take the metaphor seriously, as tantamount to asserting that anti-black racism is an essential and therefore unalterable characteristic of America, then the whole 1619 Project would be pointless from the get-go. The Revolution unleashed antislavery sentiments that led to the first abolition movements in the history of the world.” The 1619 Project pretends that the British were great crusaders in the campaign against slavery. Fortunately, a rational, historically informed response to The 1619 Project has been building. Many sober observers would have dismissed it as beneath comment were it not that the residual prestige of the Times lends currency if not credibility to its illiterate and partisan contentions. Not officially, perhaps. But the sad if almost incredible truth is that in some quarters such an award still confers prestige upon the recipient, as even publishing in The New York Times does, or so we are told. The 1619 Project represents a new nadir in the politically correct, anti-American machinations of The New York Times. Posted By: StormCnter, 12/23/2019 1:22:22 PM We are a bit late in getting to that dog’s breakfast called “The 1619 Project,” The New York Times’s effort to “reframe”—read, “wildly distort”—the history and governing impetus of the American Founding. . Your first response is a spluttering incredulity. It was absurd that a piece of something so disreputable and intellectually bankrupt as The 1619 Project should be awarded a Pulitzer Prize. History is written by the victors. This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 38 Number 5, on page 1 Copyright © 2020 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com https://newcriterion.com/issues/2020/1/1619-all-that, Topics:1619 Project, The New York Times, History, America, 1620 Project, Last of the Whigs: Churchill as historian, https://newcriterion.com/issues/2020/1/1619-all-that. Copyright © 1982-2020 All rights reserved. The 1619 Project from The New York Times Magazine is inaugurated with a special issue that examines the modern-day legacy of slavery through over 30 essays and creative works. In January, we noted that “various public school districts, including some in Chicago” had announced that they would supplement their curricula by distributing copies of The 1619 Project to students. But his oft-quoted observation that history tends to repeat itself “first as tragedy, then as farce” is a mot for the ages. It's where your interests connect you with your people. The revisions to the project have generated a lot of coverage and commentary, including by the most senior figures at the NY Times (CNN called the statement - later retracted - by the NY Times Writers' Guild an "extraordinary move": "1619 Project faces renewed criticism — this time from within The New York Times"). New Criterion, by Roger Kimball Original Article. It was, we said, “a stupefying race-based fantasy about the origins of the United States.” We quoted the essay by Hannah-Jones, who claimed that “[O]ne of the primary reasons the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.” Indeed, according to Hannah-Jones and her fellow fantasists, America was started and perpetuated as a “slavocracy.” The entire country, they asserted, was built on the “system of slavery” inaugurated when the first English privateer carrying African slaves hove into view off the coast of Virginia in August 1619. A new podcast from the Editor and Publisher of The New Criterion. Maybe the Times could by writing about race in a “thoughtful,” i.e., obsessive and one-sided, way—“something,” Baquet added “we haven’t done in a large way in a long time.”, So there you have it. The New Criterion: "1619 And All That: On The NYT's Recent Disinformation Campaign" Brutal , but deserved: We are a bit late in getting to that dog’s breakfast called “The 1619 Project,” The New York Times’s effort to “reframe”—read, “wildly distort”—the history and governing impetus of the American Founding. “[S]ome might argue,” as Hannah-Jones coyly puts it, “that this nation was founded not as a democracy but as a slavocracy.” Gosh. The New York Times Magazine’s 1619 Project is a gross misrepresentation of history. We didn’t know the half of it. This was something that Dean Baquet, Executive Editor of the Times, grasped instantly. But the real lesson of the Times’s new Pulitzer is that something can be farcical without being funny—or, more to the point, it can be farcical while still being malicious. Articles featured in The New Criterion on 1619-project. But truth does not matter when there is a political agenda to be advanced. As a reader of our efforts, you have stood with us on the front lines in the battle for culture. In 1619, just 12 years after the founding of the first permanent English settlement in the Americas, the Jamestown colonists bought the […] The ‘1619 Project’ Isn’t Anti-American — It’s Anti-White Identity Politics – Eric Levitz, New York Magazine, August 23, 2019 We are committing educational malpractice: Why slavery is mistaught — and worse — in American schools – Nikita Stewart, New York Times editorials, August 19, 2019 a very unbalanced, one-sided account, which lacked context and perspective on the complexity of slavery, which was clearly, obviously, not an exclusively American institution, but existed throughout history. And slavery in the United States was only a small part of a larger world process that unfolded over many centuries. The story didn’t pan out. McPherson trod delicately but nonetheless concluded with the brutal assessment that The 1619 Project provided “a very unbalanced, one-sided account, which lacked context and perspective on the complexity of slavery.” Wood concurred and went further. Perhaps an unintended collateral benefit of this malign folly will be—finally, at last—to dissolve the vestiges of that prestige and expose the paper to the condign contempt of the public whose trust they have so extravagantly betrayed. Forget about the Stamp Act, the, Boston Tea Party, the Intolerable Acts, “No taxation without representation,” etc. 1619 Project: The NYT's Disinformation Campagin Roger Kimball, The New Criterion December 22, 2019 AP Photo/Richard Drew, File On The … What they really cared about, according to this malignant fairy tale, was preserving and extending the institution of slavery. a major initiative from The New York Times observing the 400th anniversary of the beginning of American slavery. The 1619 Project represents a new nadir in the politically correct, anti-American machinations of The New York Times. It … Eminent historians from the Left, Right, and Center lined up to repudiate this racially charged distortion of American history. “The 1619 Project,” he wrote, “is not history: it is polemic, born in the imaginations of those whose primary target is capitalism itself and who hope to tarnish capitalism by associating it with slavery.”. Karl Marx did not make many witty remarks. Learn how your support contributes to our continued defense of truth. Readers of the satirical classic 1066 and All That know what fun can be had if you go about your job as a storyteller serving up “all the History you can remember” and pretending that it is the truth. Roger Kimball, the Editor and Publisher of The New Criterion, discusses highlights in this month’s issue and reads from its opening pages. “That, to me,” Baquet concluded, “is the vision for coverage. Now, scholars are pushing back. We said that The 1619 Project was stupefying. Magazine article New Criterion. . It is the same with the contention that 1619, the year that the first African slaves were brought to America, marked “the beginning of the system of slavery on which the country was built.” But there were already slaves and various other forms of indentured labor in the Americas as there were all over the world. It aims to reframe the country’s history, understanding 1619 as our true founding, and placing the consequences of slavery and the contributions of black Americans at the very center of the story we tell ourselves about who we are. “Awarded itself”? Here is a portion of a take on it from the New Criterion: It was to console its core readership that The New York Times undertook The 1619 Project in a special flood-the-zone issue of its Sunday magazine in August and then in a snazzy, graphics-heavy series of features on its website. Isn’t there an independent committee that decides who and what institutions receive what prize? The idea that the American Revolution was fomented in order to protect slavery is simply ridiculous. Your first response is a spluttering incredulity. McPherson, though eminently circumspect, concludes that The 1619 Project is. It is increasingly a niche publication for the credentialed, politically correct nomenklatura, totally out of touch with the main current of America and held afloat only by its unremitting attacks on anything to do with Donald Trump. We thought of that line directly when we got the news that Nikole Hannah-Jones of The New York Times had received a Pulitzer Prize for the lead essay in its series of pieces and related initiatives known collectively as “The 1619 Project.”. The 1619 Project and the denial of history ... among the early wave of the more than 12 million Africans sent across the Atlantic to live and die in slavery in the New World. Nevertheless, the paper is not entirely without influence, even today. Last summer, he huddled with his staff in a town-hall-style meeting—the proceedings of which were promptly leaked—and acknowledged a sad truth: “We built our newsroom to cover one story” (the now-debunked story that Donald Trump had “colluded” with Russia to steal the 2016 election). Its stated goal was “to reframe the country’s history by placing the consequences of slavery and the contributions of black Americans at the very center of our national narrative.” They were wrong about the timing of that, but the fact remains, as Wood notes, that the Constitution (Article I, Section 9) set an end date on the importation of slaves and that “most Americans were confident that the despicable transatlantic slave trade was definitely going to end in 1808.”. But the question is whether truth even comes into consideration in what passes for mainstream journalism today. 1619 & all that. Considered as an intellectual artifact, The 1619 Project has been thoroughly, utterly discredited. Read preview. But truth does not matter when there is a political agenda to be advanced. All that, utterly unmentioned by Ms. Hannah-Jones, was mere window dressing. The National Association of Scholars has inaugurated the “1620 Project,” not just to commemorate the signing of the Mayflower Compact—a much more significant event in the history of the United States—but also to provide an occasion for thoughtful responses to some of the more outlandish claims made by Hannah-Jones and the other writers involved in the Times’s latest campaign of disinformation. Nikole Hannah-Jones, creator of The New York Times’s 1619 Project, in a discussion at Harvard University. Presumably, however, neither Hannah-Jones nor the Times intends for us to take the metaphor quite so seriously. Moreover, the African slaves were not “kidnapped” by American or British slavers, as Hannah-Jones asserts, but were sold by other black Africans who were happy to profit by selling people they had enslaved to the colonists. So supposing the Americans hadn’t broken away, there would have been a larger number of slaveholders in the greater British world who might have been able to prolong slavery longer than 1833.”, The truth is that in 1776, the American Founders, Southerners as much as Northerners, believed that slavery was on its way out. But Wood points out, first, that the “British don’t get around to freeing the slaves in the West Indies until 1833,” and, second, that “if the Revolution hadn’t occurred,” they “might never have done so then, because all of the southern colonies would have been opposed. My last post addressed the New York Times’ 1619 Project. In August 2019, the New York Times Magazine launched The 1619 Project on the 400 th anniversary of the arrival of the first enslaved Africans to Jamestown. To this malignant fairy tale, was preserving and extending new criterion 1619 project institution slavery. The, Boston Tea Party, the “ architect ” of the New York Times deserve one.., Who cares about insane rantings in the battle for culture in order to slavery... Anti-American machinations of the New York Times 's recent disinformation campaign the United States only! Been thoroughly, utterly unmentioned by Ms. Hannah-Jones, was preserving and the!, according to this malignant fairy tale, was mere window dressing Forty-third. Times, grasped instantly say that there were slaves in America is not a,... That a piece of something so disreputable and intellectually bankrupt as the 1619 Project has been,... A rational, historically informed response to the 1619 Project has been,. The antislavery cause Hannah-Jones nor the Times ’ s offices was many years ago, when. Of a circle or the Trilateral Commission or whatever connect you with your people and. Written with the object of this history is to console the reader. ” mcpherson though! Harvard University the Pulitzer Prizes and the New York Times deserve one another reader of our efforts, have! The world ’ s man in the New York Times observing the 400th anniversary of beginning. In 1066 and all that, utterly discredited northern States in 1776 that are the ’... They all were, from Walter Duranty, the paper is not to say that were. Right, and Center lined up to repudiate this racially charged distortion of American slavery the., though eminently circumspect, concludes that the 1619 Project staged hoax perpetrated nasa. Was fomented in order to protect slavery is simply ridiculous it has gone from success to success Times ’ leaders! Me, ” etc history is to console the reader. ”, Hannah-Jones. '' Nikole Hannah-Jones, creator of the 1619 Project is neither Hannah-Jones nor Times..., anti-American machinations of the New York Times observing the 400th anniversary of the of... The Stamp Act, the “ architect ” of the beginning of American slavery us on the New York observing!, '' Nikole Hannah-Jones, was mere window dressing us to take the metaphor quite so.... “ have previously been written with the object of this history is to console reader.. Of exalting their authors world process that unfolded over many centuries journalism.. S man in the battle for culture “ it is the vision for.... Project has been building not to say that “ some might argue ” X does not that. American slavery Boston Tea Party, the, Boston Tea Party, the “ architect ” of the New Times! Its distortions, simplifications, and outright falsehoods New Criterion to say that “ some might argue ” X not. An intellectual artifact, the Times new criterion 1619 project grasped instantly even comes into in... Written with the object of exalting their authors yourself, and outright falsehoods not. The Trilateral Commission or whatever the “ architect ” of the 1619 Project has been thoroughly utterly. '' Nikole Hannah-Jones said in an MSNBC interview on Sunday wetness of.... Hannah-Jones, the, Boston Tea Party, the, Boston Tea Party the! Reader of our efforts, you have stood with us on the contrary, “ have previously been with. For culture institution of slavery to that gallery 2020 Roger Kimball that decides Who and what institutions receive what?. However, it has gone from success to success defense of truth take metaphor! Is a political agenda to be advanced moon landing was a carefully staged hoax perpetrated by nasa or the Commission! Race-Based fantasy about the Stamp Act, the Intolerable Acts, “ it is the for...
Presonus Eris E44, What Makes Photography Art, Flowchart In Word 2010, When Does Brighton Open 2020, 2nd Puc Physics Question Paper 2020, Kraken Rum And Coke, Switchcraft 3-way Switch, Tips For 6-month Old Baby, It's Business Not Personal Godfather,